Skip to content
Summon is temporarily deprecated. It is tuned for a version of Claude Code that no longer exists, and its multi-lens review does not fail loudly — it degrades into unanimous approval. Read why.

How It Works

The agents share one methodology. Each knows where it fits in the workflow, when to hand off, and when to push back.

You → Cam (Discovery) → Archie (Architecture) → Tara+Sato (Build)
Vik+Tara+Pierrot (Review)
Grace (Sprint Boundary)

Lead: Cam. You describe what you want. Cam doesn’t let you get away with vague input. She probes, clarifies, and pressure-tests until the vision is concrete. Only then does the team move on.

Lead: Archie. Before anyone writes code, Archie designs the architecture and writes an ADR (Architecture Decision Record). Wei plays devil’s advocate, challenging assumptions. No implementation starts without an approved ADR.

Lead: Pat + Grace. Pat writes acceptance criteria and prioritizes the backlog. Grace organizes work into sprint waves, sized for Claude Code’s context window.

Lead: Tara → Sato. Strict TDD. Tara writes failing tests first, then Sato makes them pass. One commit per issue, conventional commit format. No shortcuts.

Lead: Vik + Tara + Pierrot. Three parallel lenses, every time:

  • Vik checks simplicity and maintainability
  • Tara checks test quality and coverage
  • Pierrot checks security and compliance

Critical findings block the merge. This isn’t optional.

Every work item passes a 16-item checklist before closing:

  • Tests pass and cover the change
  • No security findings
  • Docs updated
  • ADR written (if architectural)
  • Board status updated

Lead: Grace. Retrospective, velocity tracking, and kaizen. What worked, what didn’t, what to improve. Then the next sprint starts with better process.

Claude Code has finite context. Summon accounts for this:

  • /handoff saves session state so you can resume later
  • /resume picks up exactly where you left off
  • Work is organized into waves: sized chunks that fit in one session
  • Commit frequently; uncommitted work is expensive to reconstruct